Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Brown Defeats Choakley

My New Senator, God help us

Nate Silver over at 538 has a decent piece of blame assignation for Coakley's loss: fivethirtyeight.com

I think he's pretty much right on. So what does all this mean? It means, not as our "friends" at the WSJ and Fox tell us, that Obama should do less. This is when Obama needs to grow a pair. Mitch McConnell says the election shows we're "tired" of Obama's agenda. Really? Eff You, Mitch. A member of a party that did ZERO for nine years to help the economy (and in fact, drove it into the ground) and to help ordinary Americans get health care? I don't think the President ought to be taking advice from you. President Obama's problem is that he has been too much of a consensus-builder. I mean, hello! Scott Brown's entire platform was that he was going to throw sand in the gears of "the Obama agenda." These people are not interested in finding a middle ground or a way forward. They are interested in Obama's failure. Why are we trying to work with them? Health care reform should have been passed by now, with or without the Republicans.

President Obama, you need to do what you said you were going to do during your campaign. That's why we voted for you. Refocus on the economy and jobs. Do it, and then let the chips fall where they may.

UPDATE: EJ Dionne says it better than I can: WaPo

1 comment:

St said...

I was waiting for your post on this. Numbers don't matter when Dems won't do anything anyway. I'd like to hope this lights a fire under the party but I'm afraid they don't mind being burned.